[froh]

> The SQLite3 business model is that SQLite3 is open source but the best test suite for it is proprietary

no.

the business model is services, and a red phone to companies who use sqlite in production. like nokia back in the days when we had these little flip phones, or desk phones had a "rolodesk" built in, or many other embedded uses of a little lovely dependable data store.

the services include porting to and "certification" on specifically requested hardware and OS combinations, with indeed proprietary test suites. now these are not owned by sqlite, but by third parties. which license them to sqlite (the company).

and it started with being paid by the likes of nokia or IBM to make sqlite production ready, add mc/dc coverage, implement fuzzing, etc etc etc.,

their license asks you to do good not evil. and they take that serious and try their best to do the same. their own stuff is to an extreme extend in the public domain.

[ale42]

> companies who use sqlite in production

It's not just old Nokias or desktop phones, nor just embedded sytsems. sqlite is almost everywhere. Adobe, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Mozilla and many other companies use it in very widely deployed software.

[cryptonector]

> > The SQLite3 business model is that SQLite3 is open source but the best test suite for it is proprietary

> no.

> the business model is services, and a red phone to companies who use sqlite in production. like nokia back in the days when we had these little flip phones, or desk phones had a "rolodesk" built in, or many other embedded uses of a little lovely dependable data store.

Members of the SQLite Consortium surely have this "red phone" you speak of. So in what way was my characterization of their business model wrong?