Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rosmax_1337 558 days ago
So it's Sweden's own people's fault for not wanting to do "integration"?

Do you believe the average Swede wanted mass immigration in the first place?

2 comments

I don't think any Swede wanted conditions in Syria to get so bad that mass numbers of people felt they needed to leave their homes, friends, and livelihood in order to survive, so no, I don't think Swedes wanted this mass immigration.

But it happened. So what next, kill them all? Starve them in concentration camps? Isolate them on islands with no hope at all of integration or work?

If only there were some way to unite the nations to set up a better system that could prevent decades of internal war and conflict, or set up a treaty for how to handle refugees.

Perhaps even just some sort of union of all the European countries to jointly and equally share the load when refugees come.

> Perhaps even just some sort of union of all the European countries to jointly and equally share the load when refugees come.

Why?

> Isolate them on islands...

Why not? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm_Jumeirah / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_(archipelago) , otherwise Malaysia and Indonesia come to mind.

> ...in concentration camps?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mina,_Saudi_Arabia <- looks comfortable. Tents even have AirCon and ability to cater for masses is proven already.

Or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Line,_Saudi_Arabia ?

In other words: why should what happened in Islamistan not stay in Islamistan? (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ummah )

Let them fuck themselves. As they always do. No need for 'the (non-islamic) world' to support that.

I'm not apportioning blame just saying that what's happening now is feeding a future of separate societies that probably everyone would rather avoid.

I don't believe the average Swede wanted mass immigration but there were immigration policies in place that were put in place by Sweden's leaders on behalf of its people that weren't questioned until later. You are where you are now - you can't unring a bell. You have to deal with the issues of the future now not the issues of the past

The bell indeed can't be unrung.

But, if one understands that what the Swedish leaders did was not on behalf of it's people, you begin to understand what the future should look like.

That's a very cryptic response. I very much don't know what you mean by it. Maybe you could spell out what you want for the future?
I will refrain, unfortunately. Have a good day.