|
|
|
|
|
by dartos
557 days ago
|
|
That argument can and probably was pointed towards movies with color, movies with audio before that, comics, movies without audio, books, etc. I don’t think that slippery slope holds up. IIRC there’s pretty solid research showing that even children beyond the age of 8 can tell the difference between fiction and reality. |
|
If media didn’t profoundly affect us, how could exposure therapy rewire fears? Why would billions be spent on advertising if it didn’t work? Why would propaganda or education exist if ideas couldn’t be planted and nurtured through storytelling?
Is there any meaningful difference between a sermon from the pulpit and a feature film in the theater? Both are designed to influence, persuade, and reshape our worldview.
As Alan Moore aptly put it: "Art is, like magic, the science of manipulating symbols, words, or images to achieve changes in consciousness."
In my opinion the old adage holds true, you are what you eat. And we will soon be eating unimaginable mountains of artificial content cooked up by dream engines tuned to our every desire and whim.