|
|
|
|
|
by Dalewyn
552 days ago
|
|
Fund managers are obligated to act according to their fund's prospectus[1], of which the specifics will vary with each fund. For a TDF (Target Date Fund), because that was brought up (Vanguard 2030): Both actively and passively managed ones must generally be managed such that shareholders can start withdrawing adequate funds (selling shares) upon and after reaching the "target date". For an S&P 500 index fund like the one I mentioned and hold (SWPPX), the fund manager is required to imitate the actual S&P 500 index as much as reasonably possible. In short, "don't have to care about long term success" is not a generally usable argument for fund management. [1]: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/prospectus.asp |
|
But the fund managers tracking an index are not the main problem, they are just putting a lot of passive votes behind the funds that are actively working on electing board members in the interest of short term growth/profit (which brings more people to invest in their funds and gets them big bonuses).