Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rybosworld 552 days ago
> what's the purpose of the stocks at all?

Dividends

> dividends are highly discouraged by taxation

This is only true today because buybacks aren't taxed

Buybacks are ultimately a way of saying "we don't have a better way to spend this money." Consider that, in a world without buybacks, execs have two choices. One is to pay dividends, and eat the tax implications. The other is to find productive ways to spend the money to increase the company's earnings. The taxation of dividends strongly motivates companies to innovate. Buybacks weaken that motivator significantly, because there's no tax implication. It's financial engineering and not a productive use of money.

Buybacks are also a pretty neat way for insiders to enrich themselves at the expense of shareholders.

Example: Insiders schedule a sell of their shares to occur right after announcing a buyback plan.

1 comments

Worth noting also that dividends aren't uniquely taxed. Worst case, they're taxed the same as income, but they can also be capital gains which are taxed at a lower rate.

So any talk of incentives should include a justification of passive investment being more valuable than work for income, if someone is asking for favorable tax treatment.

Wasn't aware of that. Yes, I've no clue what I'm talking about. But if buyback gains are also taxed as income when cashing out, what is the advantage of buybacks then?
You can defer selling capital gains for decades in a buy-and-hold portfolio, while your portfolio continues to grow. Dividends are always taxed in the current tax year. One benefit here for investors is that you can defer taking capital gains until years when you are in a lower tax bracket (e.g. retired), which you cannot do with dividends. (The US capital gains tax rate is progressive, if with fewer buckets than income. There's a 0% bucket, a 15% bucket, an 18.8% bucket, and 23.8% bucket.)
Qualified dividends are not capital gains, even if they are taxed at the same rate
GP is clearly just talking about them being taxed at the same rate.
My point was that GP's assertion that "Worth noting also that dividends aren't uniquely taxed" is wrong - they are uniquely and specifically taxed, the rate just happens to currently be the same as capital gains rates.