[xpe]

When combined with intellectual honesty and curiosity, the best LLMs can be powerful tools for checking argumentation. (I personally recommend Claude 3.5 Sonnet.) I pasted in the conversation history and here is what it said:

> Their position is falsifiable through simple examples: LLMs can perform arithmetic on numbers that weren't in training data, compose responses about current events post-training, and generate novel combinations of ideas.

Spot on. It would take a lot of editing for me to speak as concisely and accurately!