[grouchomarx]

working pro for more than a decade now, maybe some off this was relevant very early on but it's really just all web forum gear chatter. What people miss is that a photographer's job isn't using a camera or lamenting settings, it's lighting. Done artificially or by modifying what's available, you have to master both. The camera is incidental and what he's describing his just picture taking. If you're interested in photography it's more useful to take a studio lighting course and learn about fixtures and modifiers than worrying about iso.

[kmoser]

> If you're interested in photography it's more useful to take a studio lighting course and learn about fixtures and modifiers than worrying about iso.

When you do primarily street photography, and you have almost no ability to change the light, knowledge of studio lighting is all but useless.

[left-struck]

In street photography, and any photography really, paying attention to light is super important. I’d argue it’s more important when you can’t control it.

Sure you could just go out onto the street, take a bunch of photos and pay no attention to light, but if you want to improve your photos, or know why good photos are good, paying attention to light is just as important as say composition

[kmoser]

I'm not saying knowledge of lighting is unimportant. I'm saying knowledge of studio lighting is of little use when you don't have control over things like the type of lighting (daylight vs. incandescent vs. fluorescent, etc.) and lighting placement because you're shooting outdoors and you're limited largely to natural lighting (perhaps with the exception of a flash), and no ability to bounce lighting.