Did the Victorians and the Soviets both believe that time/access was the only thing keeping the proletariat from being as enthused about Art as their "betters"?
Huxley called "habitus" well before Bourdieu: Primroses and landscapes, he pointed out, have one grave defect: they are gratuitous. A love of nature keeps no factories busy. It was decided to abolish the love of nature, at any rate among the lower classes.
EDIT: "Hell — is other people" (JPS) "...whose interests aren't aligned [being] thrown into an enclosed space and forced to work together." (YK)
Unless there are any immortals (we saw a one-tail fox this morning) on HN, we're also all (along with several deer yesterday) sentenced to death ... although some of us pledge (logically if foolishly) to seek the Elixir of Life, or die trying.
>Will remembered suddenly his favourite worst line of poetry.
https://harpers.org/2009/10/arnolds-to-a-friend/
>The up-beat high Victorian view of art as a cure to the woes of society
https://harpers.org/2009/10/forster-what-the-great-minds-tel...
地獄楽 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hell%27s_Paradise:_Jigokuraku