Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by s1artibartfast 560 days ago
Want what? I dont think the majority of Americans endorse vigilante murder of law abiding citizens. That is just a vocal and bloodthirsty segment of the online population.
1 comments

Literally everyone I know IRL was like, “nice. More please.” I was actually surprised and heartened to see the initial HN thread, even, was overwhelmingly supportive.

This is top of my list for conversation topics to steer things toward when I’m around Republican relatives, so we’ll have something we can agree on.

Law-abiding doesn’t mean much when you can kill lots of people for money and remain within the bounds of the law. Killing one such person is definitely far less bad than killing a bunch of people arbitrarily. Yet only one of these cases is illegal, and it’s the better of the two.

More please of what? Vigilante murders?
Specifically of antisocial CEOs, board members, et c. That specific kind of vigilante murders.
Compared to CEO's directing their companies to legally murder people ("law abiding citizens") instead?
This is logic that makes sense inside of filter bubbles on the Internet that I think most people --- most people are not in any one particular filter bubble and certainly not this one --- would find absolutely repellant. To put it in perspective: it is literally the logic used by people who shoot up abortion clinics.
How do you feel about murdering doctors who demand pay for treatment, citizens that vote against single payer, or people that fail to donate to your gofundme?
All of those are extremely different situations, so what are you getting at?
I see them as essentially the same. All of these people are choosing their financial interests over your health. People are dying from their inaction.