|
|
|
|
|
by taeric
566 days ago
|
|
You can really only hang a claim on "abusing things not build to actually do that" on the same peg that "purity" hangs on, though? I mostly agree with the point that this is orthogonal to frameworks. I'm just putting that in here for why people disagree with many common web frameworks. A lot of the complaints that many of us have, are ultimately rooted in what they are building on top of. CSS, in particular, is remarkably ill suited for interface design. |
|
People were doing things like making rounded buttons using tables, using things self-described as "clever hacks", and they mostly stopped working because as things like new viewport dimensions showed up you needed to paper over that too.
at least from what i've seen, the other strength of CSS is that it gets used for literally everything and so it's possible to build most conceivable layouts. A lot of the other layout frameworks either just use CSS, or you might run into edge cases because of the sheer amount of things in CSS that may not be well supported elsewhere or do not have a clear parallel.