[echoangle]

Having a tool that’s 10% better doesn’t make your whole work 10% better though.

[TeMPOraL]

A "10% better" tool could make no difference, or it could make the work 100% better. The impact isn't linear.

[kolbe]

It's likely probabilistically linear... like speeding on a street with random traffic lights.

[echoangle]

Right, I should have put a "necessarily" in there.

[dawnerd]

It also doesn’t magically make you more money either.

[szundi]

Depends on the definition of better. Above example used this definition implicitly as you can see.

[jaredklewis]

Above example makes no sense since it says ChatGPT is 10% better than Claude at first, then pivots to use it as a 10% total productivity enhancer. Which is it?

[onlyrealcuzzo]

Yeah, but that's the sales pitch.

[jaredklewis]

Man, why are people making $300k so stupid though