Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hakuseki 566 days ago
The article is about (position, move) pairs. Why not call these objects "steps"?
1 comments

Yeah this is a good shot at using existing verbiage, better than the candidates I came up with at least. Still not entirely self-descriptive, and has some overlap with usage in other parts of the codebase, like in data processing and user onboarding, but maybe that's a fine trade-off to make in order to use a normal word. I'd be equally fine with them being called "steps", but now I'm attached to my Keps :D