Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ncallaway 567 days ago
I feel like that complaint is somewhat addressed by the blog post itself:

> Obviously don’t go crazy with it, but it’s a tool I’m happy to have added to the toolbox.

It sounds like your company culture has gone crazy with it, which, yea, I would think it would make it hard to reason about.

I think this kind of naming approach could be...reasonable in a shared code base, if used very sparingly and well documented.

1 comments

Yah. If your big project has 2 kinds of objects, handles, designators, whatever that are used frequently... and their alternative english names are awkward, long, and/or misleading... give them a short pronounceable name. I endorse this 100%.

Don't do it 15 times, though, because then it's going to slow down onboarding more than the benefit you get.