[nameless912]

I don't know how to write this comment in a way that won't land me in a CIA black site so I'll just start with a disclaimer that this post in no way celebrates or condones any violence, but I wouldn't be surprised if political assassination attempts go up 10-fold in the next 10 years. We already saw two different assassination attempts against Trump during the lead up to the election. You can read my older comments to know my political leanings, I don't like Trump. But wow, I'm genuinely more worried about the stability of our society because of increases in violent acts like this and the inevitable retaliation by the government against all people in the name of "security", than anything Trump could enact.

I wouldn't be surprised if New York passes new gun control laws because of this shooting; I wouldn't be surprised if there's a congresscritter or White House Staffer or judge who's assassinated in the next several years causing some kind of martial law situation. It's scary times we live in right now.

[klipklop]

I know you are half-joking, but it shows how worrying things are related to public discourse where you need such a disclaimer at the start of your argument.

The scenario you describe is rather frightening. Let's hope the "CEO class" (for lack of a better term) and the general public will allow reason and ethics to win out.

One thing that is for certain, there should be better legal limits to what companies can get away with. We need our justice system to get involved well before vigilante's start running amok. The US government should have stepped in a full decade ago to reign-in United Healthcare's misconduct and fraud.

[torified]

>Let's hope the "CEO class"... will allow reason and ethics to win out.

They won't. They're making billions out of others suffering.

>general public will allow reason and ethics to win out

"Ethics". It's a trolley problem... if a person through their actions enables many people to die, is it wrong to kill them?

To paraphrase Chris Rock... I ain't saying he should have killed him... But I understand.

[ModernMech]

> Let's hope the "CEO class" (for lack of a better term)

The term you are looking for is "oligarchs"

[dole]

New York State and City (separate firearms laws) already has some of the strictest gun control laws in the country, requiring permits for purchasing pistols within NYC, concealed carry licenses throughout the state, magazine size limits, etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_New_York

[JBlue42]

>I wouldn't be surprised if New York passes new gun control laws because of this shooting; I wouldn't be surprised if there's a congresscritter or White House Staffer or judge who's assassinated in the next several years causing some kind of martial law situation. It's scary times we live in right now.

This is most likely going to happen with an incoming authoritarian gov't anyway.

Do recall that one Congress critter, that is very pro-gun was shot at a baseball game, survived, and still stood against gun legislation. We'll see if things change if the wind shifts and more rich people (the Congresscritters' owners) are targeted.

[OutOfHere]

Trump is an exceptional case who genuinely is feared to democracy itself as risk. The logic doesn't carry over to most other national politicians, although it absolutely can at various local levels.

Besides politicians, corrupt private leaders are at risk.

I am also not convinced that assassinations will make society less stable. At least in the targeting assassin's mind, it's intended to make society more stable by eliminating corruption.

[sbalough]

It’ll get worse. You forgot to throw in unrest due to mass workforce displacement from ai / bots

[throwaway48476]

Federal judges are the only people in this country that privacy laws apply to.