[vundercind]

I'm saying if you provide a service you can't support, stop and make room for someone else to try.

Of course they'd rather provide abusive service to hold on to user-share. That's a choice they're making and I'm saying that's a bad choice, socially speaking. Good business choice, I'm sure.

[bryanlarsen]

> stop and make room for someone else to try.

In other words, kick everybody off of Youtube.

[vundercind]

If Google'd rather do that than not harm users with no human recourse unless you get the media involved, yes, that would be a more ethical choice than what they're doing now. They could also just stop being bad at the role they've elected to take on, in the first place.