|
|
|
|
|
by mrweasel
564 days ago
|
|
That's certainly an issue. There have been a number of cases where companies have demanded that people hand over domain that they "where not using". Not using being defined as "does not have a website". It feels like there should be some way of determining if a domain is actively being used, to combat squatters, but when ever someone tried to make a rule it ends up being something stupid, like not having a website. |
|