[com2kid]

The problem regarding news orgs is that they have previously sounded the alarm about bloggers, insisting that the sky was going to fall down now that any random person was allowed to just say anything they wanted and have other people read it!

But many of those blogs (which now take the form of subscription newsletters) had incredibly valuable insight and perspectives that were otherwise not being reported on. The news media's alarmism about bloggers was (IMHO rightfully) ignored.

So when a couple of years later they started freaking out about Facebook/Twitter/etc, well, same old story, new platform.

The difference this time was that FB and Twitter algorithmically fed articles to people, instead of articles naturally spreading virally from person to person.

Not that the platforms were that bad at first! Remember that in the early 2010s Facebook was largely a platform for Farmville! It was drowning in spam for free to play social games, but the feed was still largely a timeline. Twitter only released their Apple client in 2010, and there were still a large number of third party clients in 2012.

A few years later Facebook would become inundated with political spam and vitriol, but 2012 was still an insane time of growth and optimism.

[throwaway314155]

All I'm saying is that there were people who would have called it naive to be optimistic about such things- and that they were ultimately correct even though they didn't have the numbers or a proper movement.