|
|
|
|
|
|
by happytoexplain
571 days ago
|
|
|
You start off implying support for the idea of "weighing the value of the development against against the value of good taste", but then your second paragraph seems to imply the opposite extreme: That there can be no case (or vanishingly few) where we can justify the restriction of the destruction of nature/geography if it is purely aesthetic. |
|
|