|
|
|
|
|
|
by cameronh90
564 days ago
|
|
|
Photoshop's UX is poor, but everyone is used to it. GIMP's UX is even worse, and nobody is used to it. And based on those screenshots in the article, it has, if anything, got even weirder and less intuitive. I'd probably try and power through if there was even close to feature parity, but it's only just now catching up with where Photoshop was in 1994. |
|
|
GIMP was meant to be a drop in replacement for early photoshop, so it makes sense that it follows that UX idea.