|
|
|
|
|
|
by DavidPiper
574 days ago
|
|
|
And yet the things they have done have gone a long way to reducing the real harms caused by smoking. A 5% spread of harm in a population is better than spread across 80% or 90%, etc. Taking action to reduce the surface area of harm, even if 0% is impractical, is beneficial to a functioning society. |
|
|