|
|
|
|
|
by benreesman
575 days ago
|
|
I admire your candor and persistence but I think I’m just wired a bit differently. I agree that the present oligarch class is every bit as powerful in relative terms as any before them. They also have the advantage of modern technology: ubiquitous domestic surveillance and militarized police are clearly not designed to prevent petty crime. And the last thing I want to see is chaos and bloodshed. But I do want working people to regain some level of bargaining power, and with an elite as insular and vulgar as this one, that probably means a credible threat at least in abstract. Extreme military power has failed against motivated populations almost without exception in all asymmetrical scenarios this century: it is not a foregone conclusion that oppression lacks an upper bound. The end state on the current trend lines would be a catastrophic failure of our civilization. I’m not yet prepared to accept that as inevitable. |
|
When has this worked in practice to the benefit of those making the threats?
(Versus bargaining for more rights by dividing the elite.)
> Extreme military power has failed against motivated populations almost without exception in all asymmetrical scenarios this century
Internally? Each of China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Myanmar, et cetera seem to be doing fine.
> end state on the current trend lines would be a catastrophic failure of our civilization
Sure. But a revolution just speed runs that. (And we aren't the only civilisation on the planet.)
> I’m not yet prepared to accept that as inevitable
It's not even probable. Going back to the original comment, Americans' standards of living have been rising across almost every class. On an income and wealth scale, a positive-sum game, almost every category of American is better off than before.
What's changed in the last 50 years is on the relative standard. And in the political domain, a zero-sum game, that's led to some issues. But nothing terminal, not even close--ordinary workers still swing elections.