|
|
|
|
|
by gsf_emergency
575 days ago
|
|
I agree with a slight patch-- the Asian cruel steppe mentality is called "meritocracy" (which the Mongols, or at least Chinggis & his direct successors down thru Kublai, iirc, was enamoured of..) Russians, ironically, defeated the tartars when they managed to out-meritocrat the greatkhanless hordes somescore later, -Then they basically reverted to divine right of kings*, aka the mandate of heaven.. -until the time of Lenin, when the cycle began anew.. *Apologies for ignoring the slight detour of Peter the Great** (known to be enlighteningly cruel) whose table of ranks could have been said to have set "his Excellency" (Prevoskhoditel’stvo) Ulyanov up for life **but we should also pay attention to the current phenomenon of lionizing Catherine as a monarch more Christian than Peter [Recall that the christians did not meritocracy until roughly... 1848 (again, ignoring the Glourious Revolution) over thence we had Weber retconning for his tribe] ( |
|
...and that Goldstein basically writes about the meritocracy* of the Inner Party, as set out in the non-fictional The Managerial Revolution (1941).
* Smith is in the outer party precisely because he did poorly on his A-levels.