[auntienomen]

Although, the sources in this case are basically articles citing things he said on Twitter.

[yakshaving_jgt]

Does that make them invalid? Surely we’re not expecting to see Dotcom’s dangerous misinformation published in a peer reviewed scientific journal?

[mingus88]

I believe OPs point was that there is very little ambiguity when the source is his very own words posted by him directly

[indigo0086]

Are his words untrue or just disliked?

[yakshaving_jgt]

Dotcom's?

Dotcom's words are untrue, yes.