|
|
|
|
|
by edanm
567 days ago
|
|
> You can't compare him to figures like Newton and Hooke, who made both their names and their living from science. Not disagreeing with the rest of your post, just making a minor nitpick - didn't Newton actually spend most of his time on alchemy and at the Royal Mint? He definitely made his name from science (or math & science as I prefer to think of it). But his living? I don't know about that. |
|
All in all, I think that he certainly made his living from his success in science at first, even if he could have later maintained himself simply on his esteem and lofty networks at Cambridge.