|
|
|
|
|
by 082349872349872
580 days ago
|
|
Categorically, while different algebraic structures may not be isomorphic, they're likely all capable (under decoration) of carrying the same information. For instance, in the Boom Hierarchy* (sets,bags,lists,trees) we can represent the information carried by any of the structures by any of the others (exercise!) despite the fact that operations on that information may be made easier or more difficult by the presence or lack of laws (idempotency,commutativity,associativity) that are the linear delta-edges between those types-as-vertices themselves. [IIRC, magmas would be mobiles, and I'd bet we can extend the above to them as well.] * I know I repeat these often, but hey, I'm not alone: gopher-the-language was inspired by a "go" lemma-function in someone's sol'n to samefringe. |
|
I'd been at peace if you mentioned the triples, but it's too late now..