|
|
|
|
|
by Someone
580 days ago
|
|
I don’t follow your argument. Snooker is exclusive because few people can make a good living of it, and trial running is inclusive because some people can get good results in it? I bet there are people training their snooker an hour a day who have scored 147s, and I also expect very few people can make a good living doing trail running. Isn’t this more a matter of a sport being popular/having money available? If there were millions of $ available in trail running, that sub 100 hour might start looking “goo but not spectacular” |
|
The main point is "can you compete while not being fully dedicated to the sport (i.e. it being your literal day job)".
And my examples along the spectrum: running - boxing - snooker, are just an example. Shared because I think it's an interesting _aspect_ of looking at sports (one of many aspects!).