|
|
|
|
|
by oivey
582 days ago
|
|
> Because they bought it. Fair enough, but I was referencing people taking a Boeing exec’s claim that somehow regulations cause military soap dispensers to cost that much at face value. > I assume you talk about the government here? No. Read the whole sentence. I’m referencing Boeing and the tens of billions Boeing has lost on fixed price contracts. |
|
MILSPEC is a thing - but unless the soap dispenser involves electronics, I don't think that applies here.
(If someone had bought an IoT enabled soap dispenser for a military plane, that would have been their own stupidity.)