|
|
|
|
|
|
by BadHumans
583 days ago
|
|
|
> What says that Bluesky doesn’t have their flavor of propaganda that suits their preferences? Nothing. They probably do. > That is, what makes the Bluesky perspective more valid other than just being on a platform that hates Twitter? Nothing. It probably isn't. > About anything that is currently legal and permitted on Twitter seems to be specifically prohibited by design Trump's FCC chief has signaled he would like to remove Section 230 which would make these things that are prohibited a downside for BlueSky and open them up to litigation and I doubt they have the wallet to litigate like Musk does. |
|
|