|
|
|
|
|
by brailsafe
580 days ago
|
|
> i.e. What else could £100m of public money buy us, and would it be better than a 1km bat shed? Can you think of anything? It doesn't seem extraordinarily expensive given the cost of building anything these days, I'd question should the cost of building new things be so expensive, rather than should money be spent on this kind of project, because of all things to spend a large unit of money on, this does seem like a useful one. |
|
You keep making the assumption that the building has to be built at all, and that 200 million isn't unreasonable. It does not have to be and its for _bats_.