This clearly telegraphs a few things for those that are observant enough to notice.
Anyone interested in going into that field who has a brain would note that they are removing the entry level jobs using this since those are the simpler jobs.
With less demand for said labor, the more cutthroat the competition to get said jobs will be. If you double the competition, wages must naturally drop and with that so does competency and skill. When proficiency isn't rewarded, those with options go elsewhere.
When any other job with 1/10th the responsibility gets paid the same, its a simple no brainer choice.
When industry with large marketshare telegraphs this, it is a strong indicator that IT operations (in this case) will soon be a dead profession (soon being a relative generation), and anyone investing in education for it will get a negative ROI.
Upfront, they companies may get some profits off the bottom-line, but long-term they won't be able to find or keep talent. Said talent will have left and you get Atlas Shrugged dynamics.
Aside from that, that type of strategy also suggests other cascading dynamics that lead to grid/societal collapse following a burning the bridges approach. Those in their ivory towers may not see the consequences of their choices until it is too late for anything except coffin nails.
The fundamental issue of market sector concentration where few parties cooperate is that counter-party systemic risk becomes unmanageable and chaotic, destructive decisions cannot be softened.
In chaotic feedback systems, the general rule of thumb is chaos increases until the underlying imbalance is equalized.
For some, recognizing the inevitable conclusion of a series of events may dictate a radically altered approach towards life planning/survival.
This clearly telegraphs a few things for those that are observant enough to notice.
Anyone interested in going into that field who has a brain would note that they are removing the entry level jobs using this since those are the simpler jobs.
With less demand for said labor, the more cutthroat the competition to get said jobs will be. If you double the competition, wages must naturally drop and with that so does competency and skill. When proficiency isn't rewarded, those with options go elsewhere.
When any other job with 1/10th the responsibility gets paid the same, its a simple no brainer choice.
When industry with large marketshare telegraphs this, it is a strong indicator that IT operations (in this case) will soon be a dead profession (soon being a relative generation), and anyone investing in education for it will get a negative ROI.
Upfront, they companies may get some profits off the bottom-line, but long-term they won't be able to find or keep talent. Said talent will have left and you get Atlas Shrugged dynamics.
Aside from that, that type of strategy also suggests other cascading dynamics that lead to grid/societal collapse following a burning the bridges approach. Those in their ivory towers may not see the consequences of their choices until it is too late for anything except coffin nails.
The fundamental issue of market sector concentration where few parties cooperate is that counter-party systemic risk becomes unmanageable and chaotic, destructive decisions cannot be softened.
In chaotic feedback systems, the general rule of thumb is chaos increases until the underlying imbalance is equalized.
For some, recognizing the inevitable conclusion of a series of events may dictate a radically altered approach towards life planning/survival.