|
|
|
|
|
by defrost
581 days ago
|
|
The comment I replied to was this one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42190601 As you can see it made no mention of athletics. I was curious about the self referential circular definitions and enquired of a specific person what their understanding of development biology was. Thankyou for your response, it might be better directed toward the person who apparently hasn't yet realised that such a thing as intersex categories and conditions even exist. |
|
I responded to your comment because it was the most recent in the thread, but I agree that it would have perhaps made more sense as a reply to the other commenter.
Anyhow the broader point I think is worth making is that there is often a more context-specific approach, of which eligibility criteria for competitive sporting events is one example.