| Part social contract, part the knowledge of what I can do with that data. You know, somebody coming to your cubicle and taking something without asking is rude, in some cases unethical, even damaging. It's the same thing with computers. No application/website ever should be able to collect information about me without my consent. It's called a "personal computer". If the application needs telemetry from me, they can ask (not tell we're doing this, but ask), and start the moment I consent. The moment I withdraw my consent all telemetry and data collection should stop. Moreover, I shall be able to see all the telemetry data in its full glory to make my own assessment of what's collected and how. If you don't know, Go tried this, even with an arguable provable way of anonymization, people roared back, and the decision is changed to "opt-in". For some applications, I explicitly consent to telemetry because a) They ask, b) They show what they collect and do with it, and c) I do respect and trust them because of the previous encounters I had with them. The moment they break this social contract, they lose telemetry, and in most cases me as a user. ...and I have nothing to hide. |
Parent: "You bet, champ." <buys shoes>
Child: <Same speed, but happy>
Or a perhaps more familiar metaphor: rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic.
Telemetry can absolutely be useful. It can also be a toil fountain. To your point, how they behave/use this matters.