Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mulmen 579 days ago
The asteroid belt is even further than Mars so you need rapid reusability for that too.
2 comments

You don't need to go to the asteroid belt to get to meaningful asteroids, and in fact many fantastic candidate asteroids come much, much closer than Mars.
They don’t come as close as LEO though so you still need rapid reusability.
The asteroid belt doesn't have nearly the gravity well to send payloads back from, but it seems much harder to make propellant there in situ.
Some asteroids are water rich, some asteroids are mineral rich. Many mineral rich asteroids appear to be 'hydrated', meaning that among the rocks they contain ice. Solar power will be more effective on an asteroid in NEO than on the surface of Mars, but gravity will be lower. I don't know that we, as a species, really know which will be harder. They'll require different technologies, but the raw materials exist in both places sufficient to manufacture fuel.
We have a lot of experience with chemical processes like fractional distilling that will take a lot more work in micro-gravity. Yeah there are tradeoffs, but my hunch is the surface of Mars will be a lot more familiar.