Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by TremendousJudge 578 days ago
This was my first objection as well. However, if most people flip coins like that, then the measurements are valid -- the conclusions are about what average people will do, not a perfect mechanical coin flip. Otherwise you're falling in the no true coin flip fallacy.
1 comments

Yeah, if I'm actually forced to use a coin instead of a computer system, I try to ping the thing off the ceiling and at least one wall (not in that order). Hitting various other things is a benefit, not a downside.
Your point about the coin hitting other things to be more unpredictable reminded me of an interesting blog post[1] about generating cryptographically secure random numbers. The memorable part for me is the suggestion of using five coins of different shapes and sizes so they get shaken a consistent number of times in a large cup.

[1]: https://blog.sia.tech/generating-cryptographically-secure-ra...

The guy in the grandparent YouTube video suggests shaking the coin in a closed hand (or better, a box) to randomize the starting side and then transferring it unseen to someone else to flip it

Craps is also brought to mind where the dice have to bump the back wall

Let's abandon coin flipping in favour of coin shaking then
It's a shake and then a flip. Put your hand on your hip and bend your knees in tight.