[alias_neo]

I mean it's not terrible if the price is a concern, even something I'd consider "simple", like a Ford Focus is £30k these days. 70% for the driver is pretty bad though, you'd want much higher safety for the seat that's going to be occupied for 100% of the car's use, and if like myself you have young children you'll want that 5* rating for their safety (even if that includes bells and whistles like lane-exit alerts etc; they can matter when they need to).

For the sake of £10k I'd take a 5* safety rated car, likely with a better finish and quality overall, over a 3*, and as much as I'd like to be understanding about budgets, there's plenty of reliable, high-quality, safe cars on the used market for much less than their new-price.

Is there any _good_ reason to buy a mediocre car new for £20k, over a £40k+ car with a few years on it for £20k? I'm asking genuinely because I don't know, I'd buy the used car every time.

EDIT: Typos

[Nux]

Agreed. If you're just non-milionaire regular Joe a second hand great car can be cheaper than a new mediocre one.

[hulitu]

> and if like myself you have young children you'll want that 5* rating for their safety

But don't forget to put the children in child seats appropiate for their age. Else the 5* will become 0*.

[alias_neo]

100%. Don't cheap out on the car seats either, isofix, top tether, correct sizing, all the padding and side impact support, good 5-point harnesses.