|
|
|
|
|
by betageek
584 days ago
|
|
I think that's a bad misreading of the article, and life in general. When the author is saying "better" he's talking about the whole makeup of a person, not just a single advanced skill. Being amazing at maths is extremely useful, but it can be quite a narrow area of expertise, and I would imagine the author wants his child to be a good person, not a hyperfocused maths machine with no social skills. The children's achievements are combination or talent, effort and nurture that other children may not have, it doesn't make other children lesser, and they will have talents of their own. |
|
Why is it always either or with you people?
They can be good at math and still have social skills.
All else being equal knowing advance mathematics and having the ability to think through a problem critically and analyze your mistakes is huge benefit and makes you objectively better functional than your peers.
Of course just like everything there are trade offs - like the time your kid spends doing math they wont be running track - and that is fine.