[Tammilore]

Hello. I apologize that it came across this way. This was not the intention. Zerox was definitely used and I made sure to copy and include the MIT license exactly as it was inside the part of the code that uses Zerox.

If there's any additional thing I can do, please let me know so I would make all amendements immediately.

[gmerc]

You took their code, did a search and replace on the product name and you're relicensed the code AGPL?

You're going to have to delete this thing and start over man.

[leojaygod]

It appears that the MIT license was correctly included to apply to the zerox code used while the AGPL license applies to their own code. Isn’t this how it should be?