|
|
|
|
|
by gradschoolfail
581 days ago
|
|
I do respectfully interpret {pg,tlb,rtm} as preferring to become genius hunters that fail well to remaining grad students that succeed badly.. (Thanks for reminding me of the cases of Niedermeyer and Takesaki, more appropriate to remember as them grad students rather than geniuses?) Albeit the more apt metaproblem would be the one of enabling these “grad students” to hunt “genius projects” in teams. not sure if YC itself was meant to be this kind of genius project— i cant tell if that project proved its salt by seducing the {OGs} with a barrage of noble, monastic yet fecund suffering… perhaps not, since they kinda moved on to comfortable spiessig lives (as have their successors, mostly) :::: vM (good or bad faith?) sidestepped the “Rao Normalization” issue by citing only nonSTEM “geniuses”, YC embraced 2 rounds of “Rao Normalization”: “finding our ikigai by hiring G/GS to find what pple want” |
|
Lagniappe: https://archive.ph/G5nXO
Cultural revo for the old c. :=> wardriven emigration to the relatively hilly Eastcoast
>these prizes give me the willies … use… the money to help grad students
Echoes of JZY’s straight hook…
(Compare with the ineffective ennoblement of vM’s or Volodya illyich’s line)