|
|
|
|
|
|
by vitus
584 days ago
|
|
|
You're off by three orders of magnitude. My point of reference is that back in undergrad (~10-15 years ago), I recall a class assignment where we had to optimize matrix multiplication on a CPU; typical good parallel implementations achieved about 100-130 gigaflops (on a... Nehalem or Westmere Xeon, I think?). |
|
|
Which does make the clusters a fair bit less impressive, but also a lot more sensibly sized.