|
|
|
|
|
|
by GuB-42
582 days ago
|
|
|
I didn't know about "Voice of Fire" but it is the story makes it interesting. By itself, the painting is not bad, kind of like a flag, just not particularly remarkable. But that it was bought for $1.8M with taxpayer money and the controversy it created is where its real value lies. With a name like "Voice of Fire", it is almost as if it was the plan. According to the Wikipedia article, it has been valued $40M in 2014, which, if real, would have made that $1.8M a worthy investment! |
|
|