|
|
|
|
|
|
by nybsjytm
576 days ago
|
|
|
You don't even need AI to regurgitate Perelman's papers, you can do that in three lines of python. What I meant is that there's no AI you can ask to explain the details of Perelman's proof. For example, if there's a lemma or a delicate point in a proof that you don't understand, you can't ask an AI to clarify it. |
|
|