[Vegenoid]

I'm not trying to make the point that there is a comparable number of Windows servers to Linux servers, and I believe that going off "number of servers" is of limited usefulness. There are of course going to be far more Linux servers because they are far easier to provision, and the people managing them are generally going to be much more apt at orchestrating large fleets of small servers than the people managing Windows servers, which will tend towards larger servers with multiple purposes.

I'm simply trying to say that Linux is not the default assumption in many contexts where a lot of money gets spent on licenses and services for server software.

There are of course large contexts (tech companies and web servers) where Linux is the default assumption.