Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by McBainiel 584 days ago
Has a clone of a social media site ever replaced an original? The closest I can think of is Tiktok being kinda similar to Vine but that feels like a stretch.

I don't think Bluesky will succeed unless it offers something different to the basic Twitter experience. It's hard to picture enough people giving up Twitter (or using both) for it to reach the critical mass required to sustain it.

6 comments

I can't really understand why people use Twitter at all, since it's inception. It's never felt like a compelling platform and everyone I know has an account, like myself, but made it years ago for some reason and never used it.
a tweet originally was called a "status", twitter used to be a place where you would publish your instant messenger status. Early adopters used it to unify their multiple messenger platforms statuses into one.

If you changed your status on the old messengers e.g. "making a cup of tea" then it had some utility at any rate, a status was a kind of temporary notice, to be replaced by another status at another time. In an IM application you would see your online and offline contacts and see their status underneath their name. People had a few different unconnected IM applications. You could use the API to set your status in twitter and it would be set in AIM (or was it both ways?)

You could SMS in a status/tweet from a phone, many people loved that.

After that it became a way to record or broadcast other temporary notices, and then to a kind of realtime status. The concepts of a conversation happened then, talking about a topic but without direct refering other people and then with mentions @handle threads on twitter happened afterwards.

The twitter tech folks were considering making the metadata around a tweet as more important than the inside content. (e.g. RDF, foaf, geo, links, wikipedia uuids, subject topics, etc etc)

And then the masses joined in a few years after with Oprah and it was all about the message.

After that the push to VC eternal growth and the algorithm powered feed was what encouraged bad behaviour and a range of un-satisfactory responses to that behaviour which continues to this day.

So finger and ~/.plan was the original twitter then?
I used it professionally to learn about research articles written by my peers at conferences. Most academics I know have moved to Linkedin now.
I feel like Facebook was often considered a MySpace clone in its early days, despite certain differences, and I certainly think it took its place.
Reddit for Digg, Facebook for MySpace to some extent (they were pretty similar in the early days), arguably MySpace for Friendster. Stretching it a bit, Tumblr for Livejournal; they’re weren’t _that_ similar, but then nor are Twitter and Bluesky, under the surface.
reddit used to be the smaller, less popular version of digg :)
I would have said it was a Something Awful replacement.
Instagram copied Snapchat Stories, which I think is close to what you are talking about...
Have fascists ever taken over America before? We live in unprecedented times.