[alephnerd]

Musk is just one donor among dozens.

One of the biggest donor yes, but not enough to move the needle.

Also, the presidency is not enough to move the needle - you need down ballot support from both houses of Congress as well, which is a relationship Musk did not build unlike other donors.

[collingreen]

One donor, thanked at length by name in the president's acceptance speech, and immediately appointed over a brand new office about "efficiency" after yelling incessantly about deleting entire government departments.

Elon has a huge amount of influence over khan's future and the ftc's ability to continue in its recent push to actually protect the American consumers.

[alephnerd]

> brand new office

DOGE is a presidential task force. They are impotent like any other task force.

If you want something to worry about with the new administration, worry about the shitshow that Senate confirmation will be for much of 2025 as Senate Leadership and the Executive will clash

> the ftc's ability

The Khan style vision of antitrust (which I strongly oppose as well btw) will continue under Trump as it did under Biden.

It has bipartisan support because of bipartisan donor relations.

Oren Cass, Lina Khan, Matt Stoller, and Rohit Chopra are all cut from the same cloth.

[sumedh]

> worry about the shitshow that Senate confirmation will be for much of 2025 as Senate Leadership and the Executive will clash

Can they just get people on the Acting title and not worry about senate confirmation?

[alephnerd]

> Can they just get people on the Acting title and not worry about senate confirmation?

No.

The people who get "Acting" titles only have a lifespan of a couple months AND they need to be existing members of the bureaucracy who are 1 level below the senate appointed role.

The US is not a parliamentary system like India, UK, Canada, or Australia where the executive has power over cabinet nomination.

The US's system was explicitly built so that the president is hemmed in this manner.

[StackRanker3000]

”To move the needle” usually means to have a measurable/noticeable effect. It feels a bit weird to say that the presidency of the United States doesn’t have any effect on who the chair of the FTC is

[alephnerd]

> It feels a bit weird to say that the presidency of the United States doesn’t have any effect on who the chair of the FTC is

Because it requires Senate confirmation.

The US has one of the weakest presidencies globally for that reason.

Other than foreign policy, presidents are largely hemmed by that fact.

[sumedh]

> which is a relationship Musk did not build unlike other donors.

How do you know that?