|
|
|
|
|
by elektrontamer
577 days ago
|
|
> You're straw-manning. I never proposed anything like government enforcement against misinformation. Tyranny is the only alternative to free speech. I just don't see it ending in any other way. > I don't think misinformation should be illegal, for the reasons you touch on: You certainly don't want government deciding the truth. Awesome! Then we can stop making such a big deal out of misinformation and protect free speech. > But I can at least hope you can agree that misinformation as a concept is unethical, right? People are literally dying because of misinformation. Yes lying is unethical it's been established thousands of years ago. |
|
Absolutist free speech would allow you to publicly plot the assassination of whomever you wanted to, or permit insider trading, etc.
Speech is a tool. It's utility and morality depends on the weilder of it.