|
|
|
|
|
by xnorswap
587 days ago
|
|
I recommend that you step away from "research". Have you ever seen Congress debate laws around computing and the internet? Ever wondered how clueless they appear in that context? They're lawmakers, that doesn't make them sudden experts in a wide range of fields. They are susceptible to outlandish conspiracy theories. |
|
These politicians are not experts, but the witnesses that have testified under oath are.
Lue Elizondo - GS15 officer at the DIA, who's last assignment was running Special Access Program for the National Security Council.
David Grusch - GS15 officer at NRO then NGA who handled the Presidential Daily Briefing for the NGA (meaning he was cleared to thousands of SAPs to consolidate information and brief the president)
[Karl Nell](https://www.linkedin.com/in/karl-nell-98203510/details/exper...) - too many positions to list, but one of the most notable was being a senior technical advisor to the Army's future command.
I don't disagree that congress gets lost in conspiracy theories, but almost never do people pandering those testify under oath in public, or privately to the intelligence committees or ICIG. You should open your mind and take a deeper look than the headlines.