|
|
|
|
|
by keiferski
588 days ago
|
|
My point is that having work that is obviously AI-generated is now a negative thing. If, in the future, there is a way to validate humanity (as I mentioned in my comment), then any real writers will likely use it. Anyone that doesn't validate their humanity will be assumed to be an AI. The reaction to this may or may not be negative, but the broader point is that in this scenario, the AI won't be eating all human creations. |
|
Any technology capable of distinguishing between machine- and human-created text or artwork will simply be placed in a feedback loop and used for training the next generation of models.
If this indeed turns out to be a fight, humans won't win it. So let's not bother with the fighting part.