[mintplant]

My assumption is that this will be used to watermark images coming out of cloud-based generative AI.

[jsheard]

And they'll say it's to combat disinformation, but it'll actually be to help themselves filter AI generated content out of new AI training datasets so their models don't get Habsburg'd.

[Y_Y]

> their models don't get Habsburg'd.

You mean develop a magnificent jawline, or continue to influence Austrian politics?

[selimthegrim]

I was reading an article lately about how a lot of that was really just immensely dumb luck on their inbreeding part - that is, they ended up picking just exactly the worst sort

[glenneroo]

How do they still influence Austrian politics? Do you have any links or sources? I'm genuinely curious!

[muppetman]

I wondered why they'd be doing this NOW and this makes perfect sense!!

[leemailll]

>so their models don't get Habsburg'd.

Nice metaphor

[Animats]

Why? Those are not copyrightable.

[xd1936]

Because downstream consumers of the media might want to know if an image has been created or manipulated by AI tools.

[Jerrrrrrry]

hardware self-evident modules to essentially sign/color all digital files

now we need more noise

[poincaredisk]

This still leaves out non cooperating image generators, and the real bad guys (organised disinformation grups) will use them.

[Moru]

They would not want to train their next model on the output of the previous one...

[pbhjpbhj]

Who says?