[naasking]

Not sure what's so controversial, it's well known that LLMs can trivially be viewed as operating in higher dimensional space:

https://gcptips.medium.com/a-geometric-perspective-on-large-...

As for generalizing to algorithms, LLMs don't yet do this as well as humans, but they do do it:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02390

Finally, there's no intrinsic reason why an AI that can reliably solve deductive problems like ARC would be limited to two dimensions.

[benchmarkist]

Then you have no reason to argue with me.

[naasking]

The only position I took issue with, and still do, is my closing paragraph of my last post. Your argument for why ARC solvers wouldn't generalize doesn't even make sense.

[benchmarkist]

No point in arguing. If you think it will generalize then there is no reason to convince random people on the internet that ARC-AGI solver will get you closer to AGI.