|
|
|
|
|
by sirspacey
590 days ago
|
|
No. A legion of edtech companies have been born and died who solve the underlying pedagogical issues but die. Some of the reasons they die are: - students don’t control the budget for their spending, so their voice/progress has almost no impact on budgets - parents in the US spend a tiny fraction of their deposable income on education (and also have almost no say in budgets) - teachers have almost no say in budgets. In public schools, it’s none. In others, it’s performative if at all most of the time. - administrators get promoted by doing a very specific set of small things, none of which include improving outcomes through addressing pedagogical innovation This all adds up to: you can create an edtech startup that radically improves student outcomes and still run out of cash |
|